Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Friday, November 27, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Thursday, November 05, 2009
Deadly Shooting at Army Base
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Friday, October 09, 2009
Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize?
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
History is continuously being written prematurely in regards to this administration. I would hate to be in the Obama camp, because now he'll have to prove he deserves the award. Well...I guess if he can get blamed for screwing things up before he's done anything that opens the field to him getting credit before he's done anything, too.
Thursday, October 08, 2009
Friday, September 25, 2009
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Friday, September 11, 2009
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Ignorant Congressman Yells At President During Formal Address
So is this the new trend in politics? That grace and etiquette are not even welcomed in the halls of Congress? This was not gutsy, it was crude, disrespectful and frankly ignorant. But then, the base (and I use that term as an adjective and a noun)will just make a hero out of Wilson. Move over, Joe the Plumber, now there’s Joe the Politician.
Monday, September 07, 2009
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Friday, September 04, 2009
Fried Butter? Seriously?
Believe it or not, I actually cannot comment on this.
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/1578877.html
Shared via AddThis
http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/1578877.html
Shared via AddThis
Wednesday, September 02, 2009
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Sheri's Random Rant: Armed and Disgruntled Protesters
I just read an article about some guy bringing an assault rifle to a protest of a presidential town hall. Before that some other brainiac brought a gun that he admitted was loaded to a protest where the president was speaking. They all claim that they are doing it to exercise their right to bear arms and if you believe that dribble you are a lost cause.
I am furious over this growing trend because it has nothing to do with exercising their rights--the fact that you bought a gun is exercising your rights to bear arms. Taking a gun to a presidential event whether you were inside or out is a threat, and given that the people bringing these guns are so off-the-charts mentally that they believe the government is planning to execute their grandparents only gives it more reason to view it as a threat. Historically, unstable or angry citizens with guns and presidents usually did not turn out well. This rage has nothing to do with this administrations' policies and everything to do with a cultural shift scaring the hell out of some doomsday seekers. These people aren't willing to accept the results of a democratic process unless it works in their favor. I have yet to come across one of these geniuses that was even capable of defining what socialism and communism are, and the fact that they think the terms can be used interchangeably is proof that they are up in arms about something and they don't even know what the hell that "something" is. And what is so ironic is that these so-called Freedom Fighters are probably going to end up triggering a backlash that will actually restrict gun laws in states because of their idiocy.
And please don't waste my time with some ******** "argument" about some random liberal that you can't cite that didn't like Bush because I doubt very much they were armed.
I didn't vote for George W. Bush, but I didn't want him to fail, either. Why? BECAUSE I LIVE HERE! Wanting the administration in power to fail makes about as much since as hoping a town bridge you are driving on collapses because you don't like the mayor. I would have had a severe problem with anyone bringing a gun to any of his engagements because that would have been a threat to the president of my country. Even if I didn't vote for him, I at least had the grace to accept that the candidate I wanted lost. He was still my president. I didn't have to like him to respect his position. That line of thinking is this lovely concept called being an adult.
Whether you like Obama or not, he's still your president. Whether you agree with his policies, he's still your president. Whether this cultural shift has you scared as hell because anything different signifies the apocalypse to you, HE'S STILL YOUR PRESIDENT. If you want to protest, great! Don't want a bill passed? Write your freaking Congress member! Still don't like the president? CAMPAIGN HARDER NEXT TIME. But don't go around with silent threats to the President of the United States because you lack the dignity to respect the democratic process!
I am furious over this growing trend because it has nothing to do with exercising their rights--the fact that you bought a gun is exercising your rights to bear arms. Taking a gun to a presidential event whether you were inside or out is a threat, and given that the people bringing these guns are so off-the-charts mentally that they believe the government is planning to execute their grandparents only gives it more reason to view it as a threat. Historically, unstable or angry citizens with guns and presidents usually did not turn out well. This rage has nothing to do with this administrations' policies and everything to do with a cultural shift scaring the hell out of some doomsday seekers. These people aren't willing to accept the results of a democratic process unless it works in their favor. I have yet to come across one of these geniuses that was even capable of defining what socialism and communism are, and the fact that they think the terms can be used interchangeably is proof that they are up in arms about something and they don't even know what the hell that "something" is. And what is so ironic is that these so-called Freedom Fighters are probably going to end up triggering a backlash that will actually restrict gun laws in states because of their idiocy.
And please don't waste my time with some ******** "argument" about some random liberal that you can't cite that didn't like Bush because I doubt very much they were armed.
I didn't vote for George W. Bush, but I didn't want him to fail, either. Why? BECAUSE I LIVE HERE! Wanting the administration in power to fail makes about as much since as hoping a town bridge you are driving on collapses because you don't like the mayor. I would have had a severe problem with anyone bringing a gun to any of his engagements because that would have been a threat to the president of my country. Even if I didn't vote for him, I at least had the grace to accept that the candidate I wanted lost. He was still my president. I didn't have to like him to respect his position. That line of thinking is this lovely concept called being an adult.
Whether you like Obama or not, he's still your president. Whether you agree with his policies, he's still your president. Whether this cultural shift has you scared as hell because anything different signifies the apocalypse to you, HE'S STILL YOUR PRESIDENT. If you want to protest, great! Don't want a bill passed? Write your freaking Congress member! Still don't like the president? CAMPAIGN HARDER NEXT TIME. But don't go around with silent threats to the President of the United States because you lack the dignity to respect the democratic process!
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Once Again, Palin Needs to Retract Her Finger
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Friday, August 07, 2009
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
HD William Shatner Reads Sarah Palin's Farewell Speech
This is verbatim. What would we do without her? Here is the transcript . Here is the transcript to her speech:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/akmuckraker/sarah-palins-farewell-add_b_245215.html
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Seeing that some of the things mentioned in this book are now popping up on the news, I decided to post an overdue note of the impression I received from this book. I finished reading it a bit ago...I couldn't put it down when I started it, but I was curled up on the couch with a blanket over my head like I was reading a horror story. I think I was more relaxed while reading The Exorcist. I kept expecting him to pop out of the book with a meat cleaver or something. My pre-Angler thoughts on Cheney were that I was part in awe of him because from an analytical perspective he is absolutely fascinating, but in the same way Hannibal Lector would be a fascinating study. Other than that, he just struck me as being extremely creepy. After reading this book, however, those sentiments are amplified. I can't believe he's human. The volume of knowledge he possesses about politics and people is insane. At first, Cheney just gave me the creeps. Now I am flat-out terrified of him and what is strange is that I am sure that was never the author's intention. It was presented as just a regular this-is-what-happened book and if you put another person as the person-of-interest instead of Cheney it would probably have been just a regular this-is-what-happened book. I strongly recommend this book. Even if you aren't interested in politics it would still make an awesome horror read.
Monday, July 06, 2009
Creepy Dancing Baby Commercial
It's more creepy than cute...especially when they jumped on that fence. If the right scary music was playing I would have peed myself.
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Friday, July 03, 2009
PALIN STEPS DOWN AND LEAVES POLITICS FOREVER
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
2008 Senatorial Election FINALLY Over!
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Thursday, June 11, 2009
WHO Has Declared Swine Flu Pandemic
Out of the 71 countries where it has been found, less than 30,000 people have caught it and out of those, 141 have died. I'm still not getting how this has reached crisis mode. The people that died from the flu either had additional health issues that contributed to the flu or lived in areas where health care is extremely poor.
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Shooting At Holocaust Museum
First the murder of the doctor in Kansas in his own church and now this? The hate-mongers seem to be coming out of the woods in droves now.
Friday, June 05, 2009
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Bin Laden Sends America Another Warning
Because like any sociopath, he's not worth anything if his name doesn't stay in the news. For crying out f******, why won't he just DIE already!
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Friday, May 15, 2009
"Slumdog Millionaire" Child Star Literally Living Out His Role
Indian officials tore down their shanty. Would someone explain to me how that film made over $300 million got 8 Oscars and the sons of bitches in Hollywood couldn't buy those kids a damn house?
Friday, May 08, 2009
Person Responsible for Disastrous NYC Flyover Resigns
Ignoring the idea that a huge plane flying low over New York would cause a panic is not just cruel, it's stupid. The genius resigned and it certainly took long enough.
Sunday, April 26, 2009
U.S. Declares Swine Flu Emergency
First Mad Cow disease, then Bird Flu and now Swine Flu? If lamb or fish is hit next, I am going to become a vegetarian hermit.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Friday, April 17, 2009
PETA Advocates Cannibalism!
In another disgusting attempt for press, PETA, the unmedicated alleged animal advocacy group contacted George Clooney to get permission to use sweat from a stolen gym towel to use as basis for a sweat-flavored tofu. They planned to call it "CloFu."
George Clooney replied through a representative, "As a mammal, I am offended."
Should the Apocalypse occur in our lifetime, I advocate that members of PETA are thrown on the grill. Their eating plans resemble that of cows anyway, so they should be fine with soy sauce.
George Clooney replied through a representative, "As a mammal, I am offended."
Should the Apocalypse occur in our lifetime, I advocate that members of PETA are thrown on the grill. Their eating plans resemble that of cows anyway, so they should be fine with soy sauce.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Sheri's Random Rant: Tax Protesters
I've held my peace on this because I figured that I was wasting my time trying to reason with people of this mindset. Few of them do their homework before they get riled up anyway so in the end you are stuck listening not to a genuine concern but ideological pouting in the guise of a genuine concern. If no one will take the time to learn that the concepts of communism and socialism are not interchangeable then what hope do you have for getting them to do anything else. What really gets me is that I am willing to bet that not even half of the people dangling teabags off their hats even qualify for the terrible tax hike that they are convinced will bring them down.How exactly do these people expect the debt to get paid down without taxes? The graduated income tax was created for a reason, not as some gimmick to pick on successful people. THERE WAS NO WERE ELSE TO GET MONEY TO PAY FOR THINGS THAT THESE PEOPLE TAKE FOR GRANTED. They protested in parks paid by taxpayer money, this country's military is funded with taxpayer money, the roads that they drove on were created with taxpayer money. If any of these geniuses have a realistic way of generating money to fund little things like this, I would really like to hear it. Oh, and spare everyone with the "lower taxes will fix the economy" mantra. Unless you have been in a coma for eight years we've already tried that. I believe it was Einstein who said that the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
I can forgive a lot of things, but not active stupidity.
I can forgive a lot of things, but not active stupidity.
Teabaggers, Unite!
I really don't know what to say...I mean, what can you say about a group that carries signs that say "Teabag Obama!" while not getting why everyone is giggling at them. Seriously, taxes are necessary. Where do you think the government gets the funds to pay for the military, roads, schools, etc. that you geniuses take for granted. All you are doing is polluting the waters with tea or looking damned silly dangling tea bags while you completely ignore the fact that these taxes won't affect your bracket.
I can forgive a lot of things, but not stupidity.
I can forgive a lot of things, but not stupidity.
Thursday, April 09, 2009
Asian Names Too Much for Cro-Magnon Texas Legislator
I don't know what is scarier: the fact that relics like her are in government or the fact there are THAT many ignorant people concentrated in the same area to allow her a majority vote.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6365320.html
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6365320.html
Friday, April 03, 2009
Barbaric Flogging Videoed in Pakistan
I ardently support the idea of embracing other cultures, but there is culture and there is barbarism, and this clearly falls in the lap of the latter. A teen was accused of having an affair with her father-in-law, which more than likely was either a rape or an attempted one...or a simple refusal of his advances. This video shows the teen being figuratively quartered while another whips her after pulling her burqa up. In the background, someone is giving the beaters tips on how to carry out this monstrosity more effectively.
Disgusting.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Green Thumbs
I was talking to an old friend a few days ago about gardens and she reminded me of a former supervisor who nicknamed me "Poison Ivy" because I had so many plants on my desk.
"He was just teasing," I said. "I wasn't that bad."
My friend paused then replied, "Do you remember that TREE you were trying to grow in your apartment?"
I do have a deep love for growing things. While other people had pet goldfish, during my years of living in dorms I had two pet Venus Fly Traps named Mojo Jojo and Mr. Bojangles. My side of the room always looked like the Garden of Eden. Had I not decided on my current career path I would have been equally happy pursuing a career in botany. I'm like a child in a toy store whenever I am in the garden sections of stores. My so-called green thumb has resulted in my home becoming a cross between a plant orphanage and hospital. I have had near-dead plants left on my doorstep more than once that I have nursed back to health and recently my nephew checked in his dying cabbage. A plant is one of the few things on this planet that has mastered the art of reciprocation. The more you put into a plant, the more it gives back. Fruit and vegetable plants reward your care with food. House plants (well, certain types) reward you with a fresher smelling home. Flowers reward you with their beauty. Growing things is a spiritual experience for me. I have embraced the idea of being an amateur botanist.
And in my defense, I found good homes for all of my plants whenever I had to move...including the tree.
"He was just teasing," I said. "I wasn't that bad."
My friend paused then replied, "Do you remember that TREE you were trying to grow in your apartment?"
I do have a deep love for growing things. While other people had pet goldfish, during my years of living in dorms I had two pet Venus Fly Traps named Mojo Jojo and Mr. Bojangles. My side of the room always looked like the Garden of Eden. Had I not decided on my current career path I would have been equally happy pursuing a career in botany. I'm like a child in a toy store whenever I am in the garden sections of stores. My so-called green thumb has resulted in my home becoming a cross between a plant orphanage and hospital. I have had near-dead plants left on my doorstep more than once that I have nursed back to health and recently my nephew checked in his dying cabbage. A plant is one of the few things on this planet that has mastered the art of reciprocation. The more you put into a plant, the more it gives back. Fruit and vegetable plants reward your care with food. House plants (well, certain types) reward you with a fresher smelling home. Flowers reward you with their beauty. Growing things is a spiritual experience for me. I have embraced the idea of being an amateur botanist.
And in my defense, I found good homes for all of my plants whenever I had to move...including the tree.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Alaska and Florida Considering Ban on Bestiality
They are just considering it? Shouldn't that have been a foregone conclusion? And why is this child rapist that they are citing as an example free to walk out on the streets anyway?
Thursday, March 12, 2009
JIM CRAMER GETS SERVED!
I don't know if he took a Xanax before he went on the show, but Jim Cramer came on The Daily Show like a cheating husband begging his wife back.
Jim Cramer got the SMACKDOWN!
Jim Cramer got the SMACKDOWN!
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Monday, March 09, 2009
Tuesday, March 03, 2009
Rape Victim Basher to Speak at Rape Survivor Fundraiser
I heard about this on the news and I didn't believe it until I saw it on the website of the organization. My shock isn't because of O'Reilly's political views, it is because he has unapologetically bashed survivors more than once and has not recanted on any of his statements. He said that Shawn Hornbeck (the child that was kidnapped at age 11 and SA'd for four years) "liked" being in that situation.
Jennifer Moore commentary (this was a radio show so I could only get a transcript of what was said):
O'REILLY: So anyway, these two girls come in from the suburbs and they get bombed, and their car is towed because they're moronic girls and, you know, they don't have a car. So they're standing there in the middle of the night with no car. And then they separate because they're drunk. They separate, which you never do. All right.
Now Moore, Jennifer Moore, 18, on her way to college. She was 5-foot-2, 105 pounds, wearing a miniskirt and a halter top with a bare midriff. Now, again, there you go. So every predator in the world is gonna pick that up at two in the morning.
I just saw on the news that the organization has released a statement saying that they are aware of Bill O'Reilly's comments and they are not going to cancel him because it is "not an issue." I am looking for a link showing this and will post it when I have located one.
WTF? Why stop there? Why not invite other victim bashers? Why not invite their secondary abusers, hell, since something like that doesn't matter why not go all out and invite the criminals responsible for the existence of that organization! To allow someone that feels this way about survivors seems about as sensible as letting David Duke speak at the NAACP centennial celebration. I don't understand why they would do something like this.
Jennifer Moore commentary (this was a radio show so I could only get a transcript of what was said):
O'REILLY: So anyway, these two girls come in from the suburbs and they get bombed, and their car is towed because they're moronic girls and, you know, they don't have a car. So they're standing there in the middle of the night with no car. And then they separate because they're drunk. They separate, which you never do. All right.
Now Moore, Jennifer Moore, 18, on her way to college. She was 5-foot-2, 105 pounds, wearing a miniskirt and a halter top with a bare midriff. Now, again, there you go. So every predator in the world is gonna pick that up at two in the morning.
I just saw on the news that the organization has released a statement saying that they are aware of Bill O'Reilly's comments and they are not going to cancel him because it is "not an issue." I am looking for a link showing this and will post it when I have located one.
WTF? Why stop there? Why not invite other victim bashers? Why not invite their secondary abusers, hell, since something like that doesn't matter why not go all out and invite the criminals responsible for the existence of that organization! To allow someone that feels this way about survivors seems about as sensible as letting David Duke speak at the NAACP centennial celebration. I don't understand why they would do something like this.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Something I Have Learned
Putting pictures of that girl from The Exorcist on household cleaners and other household poisons is far more effective than just telling little kids to stay away from them.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Roland Burris Poems Inspired by the Stylings of Mike Meyers
ROLAND!
RO-LAND!
ROOOOOOOOOOO-LAND!
He wants this seat
Despite all the heat
He just got new stationary
Barack. Quinn. Harry and those hot Democrats
They want him gone
Tossed out on the lawn
Much attitude
Against this old dude
Blago's appointee is screwed
Jane, get me off this crazy thing called...the Senate
********
Roland Bur-ris
Burrowing in his chair
Dems hate him--he don't care
He furrows...AH-HAW!
RO-LAND!
ROOOOOOOOOOO-LAND!
He wants this seat
Despite all the heat
He just got new stationary
Barack. Quinn. Harry and those hot Democrats
They want him gone
Tossed out on the lawn
Much attitude
Against this old dude
Blago's appointee is screwed
Jane, get me off this crazy thing called...the Senate
********
Roland Bur-ris
Burrowing in his chair
Dems hate him--he don't care
He furrows...AH-HAW!
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
New York Post Protests Escalate
Let's take a look at the situation: a racially sensitive cartoon was published when the 100th anniversary of the NAACP, the 200th celebration of Abraham Lincoln's birthday and Black History Month were occurring simultaneously while the country's first black president is in office.
What the hell did you think would happen?
What the hell did you think would happen?
Monday, February 23, 2009
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Quote of the Month
“We need messengers to really capture that region - young, Hispanic, black, a cross section ... We want to convey that the modern-day GOP looks like the conservative party that stands on principles. But we want to apply them to urban-surburban hip-hop settings. We need to uptick our image with everyone, including one-armed midgets.”
- Michael S. Steele, Republican National Committee Chairman
************
I don't know what is funnier: the idea of the GOP adopting rap as a medium or...no, that's the best part.
- Michael S. Steele, Republican National Committee Chairman
************
I don't know what is funnier: the idea of the GOP adopting rap as a medium or...no, that's the best part.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
New York Post Shows True Colors
Before I comment on this...before I even post the article and the cartoon, I am going to save myself a lot of trouble by going ahead and replying to the typical responses to situations like this:
1.) Al Sharpton is just using this as a excuse to get back into the news.
A: Normally I would agree with a statement like this, but this is a "duh" moment. If a race has had a history of being referred to as apes and chimps, then of course making a cartoon like this is going to be offensive. This isn't a situation exclusive to blacks...every race has a disparaging stereotype. The chimp cartoon is offensive because it taps into generational wounds.
2.) Bush was referred to as a chimp and no one said anything...isn't that racist that it is a problem to criticize the black president but it is OK to criticize Bush?
A: It is OK to criticize a president. Clearly no one has a problem with that given that there are already dozens of cartoons that do criticize him that have not made the news. If Bush's race had a history that was comparable to the one mentioned in the response to Statement #1, it would be a problem, too.
3.) Congress wrote the bill, so the cartoon is talking about Congress, not Obama.
A: The New York Post--which is owned by the same company that created Fox News--referred to the stimulus bill as "Obama's Economic Stimulus Bill." Nice try. http://www.nypost.com/topics/topic.php?t=Barack+Obama
4.) I'm black and I don't find it offensive.
A: Congratulations for finding the cure to generational wounds! Why don't you bottle it up and sell it to everyone else? And on a side note, when did you become the spokesperson for the rest of us? No, I am not acting as a spokesperson myself by pointing this cartoon out. I am stating the obvious: this cartoon is going to strike a deep-set and painful nerve on a level that doesn't equate to other critical cartoons.
5.) The First Amendment protects their right to publish anything they want.
A: Of course it does...it also protects our right to speak out against it.
6.) Why are you trying to stir up trouble with this race stuff?
A: Spoken like a true racist on the defensive.
Well, hopefully that will save me the trouble of dealing with cliché responses. Here is the article:
Comment:
OK, New York Post...this is as transparent as plastic wrap. To try to throw this one off as being "made into something it isn't" is insulting. Why don't you just call it a day and reinstate your hoods-and-sheets dresscode? Not everyone is as ignorant to reality as your readers.
1.) Al Sharpton is just using this as a excuse to get back into the news.
A: Normally I would agree with a statement like this, but this is a "duh" moment. If a race has had a history of being referred to as apes and chimps, then of course making a cartoon like this is going to be offensive. This isn't a situation exclusive to blacks...every race has a disparaging stereotype. The chimp cartoon is offensive because it taps into generational wounds.
2.) Bush was referred to as a chimp and no one said anything...isn't that racist that it is a problem to criticize the black president but it is OK to criticize Bush?
A: It is OK to criticize a president. Clearly no one has a problem with that given that there are already dozens of cartoons that do criticize him that have not made the news. If Bush's race had a history that was comparable to the one mentioned in the response to Statement #1, it would be a problem, too.
3.) Congress wrote the bill, so the cartoon is talking about Congress, not Obama.
A: The New York Post--which is owned by the same company that created Fox News--referred to the stimulus bill as "Obama's Economic Stimulus Bill." Nice try. http://www.nypost.com/topics/topic.php?t=Barack+Obama
4.) I'm black and I don't find it offensive.
A: Congratulations for finding the cure to generational wounds! Why don't you bottle it up and sell it to everyone else? And on a side note, when did you become the spokesperson for the rest of us? No, I am not acting as a spokesperson myself by pointing this cartoon out. I am stating the obvious: this cartoon is going to strike a deep-set and painful nerve on a level that doesn't equate to other critical cartoons.
5.) The First Amendment protects their right to publish anything they want.
A: Of course it does...it also protects our right to speak out against it.
6.) Why are you trying to stir up trouble with this race stuff?
A: Spoken like a true racist on the defensive.
Well, hopefully that will save me the trouble of dealing with cliché responses. Here is the article:
Feb 18, 10:28 AM EST
NY cartoon appears to link Obama to dead chimp
By KAREN MATTHEWS
Associated Press Writer
NEW YORK (AP) -- The Rev. Al Sharpton says a New York Post cartoon that appears to link President Obama to a violent chimpanzee is "troubling at best."
The cartoon in Wednesday's Post by Sean Delonas shows a dead chimp and two police officers, one with a smoking gun.
The caption reads, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."
The cartoon refers to Travis the chimp, who was shot to death by police in Stamford, Conn., on Monday after it mauled a friend of its owner.
It links the chimp to Obama, who signed his administration's economic stimulus plan on Tuesday.
Sharpton called the cartoon offensive and divisive.
The Post had no immediate comment.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.
Comment:
OK, New York Post...this is as transparent as plastic wrap. To try to throw this one off as being "made into something it isn't" is insulting. Why don't you just call it a day and reinstate your hoods-and-sheets dresscode? Not everyone is as ignorant to reality as your readers.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
"The Most Vilified Mother in America?"
We have all heard about Nadya Suleman, the mother of the octuplets that this country loves to hate. She is called selfish. She is called insane. She has been getting death threats and action groups are politicizing her story. People are going through her finances and publishing the name of the sperm donor and harassing him. And now Dateline NBC has dubbed her the "most vilified mother in America."
The basis of this hatred towards this woman is the fact that she is no longer married, she can't conceive children naturally--and please do not be silly enough to suggest adoption; married people have problems adopting children, do you really think the system would give her a break?--so she chose in-vitro fertilization. Everyone is so busy basking in the glow of their unearned sense of self-righteousness that they won't even acknowledge that the fact that these children survived is a miracle.
I'm not going to pass judgment on this woman for her decision (and I don't think that anyone else should, either), but there is a gross double standard that is being glossed over. The Duggar family is on its 18th or 19th kid and plans on having more and they get cooed on the Today Show with gifts and even get their own television show. They have a place on their site where people can donate money to them, and that is OK with everyone. The Duggar family gets nothing but praise. They keep having kids because it "makes [them] feel young" and soon as the child starts talking the kid is dumped on one of the older children to be raised in their "buddy system." Everyone is fine with the fact that Bob and Michelle Duggar have a permanent baby shower registry at Wal-Mart or wherever it is that they go. No one feels sorry for those kids or thinks the parents need to be locked up. But this woman "has issues" and everyone is pitying her kids for her "irresponsibility." This woman chooses to have a large family and she is branded as being mentally unstable because she chose not to get married? Her mother condemns her to anyone that will listen because she "wasn't raised to have kids without getting married?" If she were married would that make her more "stable" in their eyes?
She had 14 children. There is no evidence of abuse or neglect, but she is the mother that everyone loves to shake their fingers at. She is the most hated mother in America. She is getting death threats not for running a child prostitution ring, but for giving birth. There are children being neglected at this very moment. There are children being verbally abused and underfed at this very moment. There are mothers and fathers at this very moment in this country right now beating, sexually abusing or selling their children to be sexually abused by paying pedophiles...yet Nadya Suleman is the most vilified mother in America? Instead of spending all this rage on someone whose crime is wanting a large family, why not put that rage where it deserves to be: at the people that have children and are actually abusing them. I think some of those children would love to have some of the indignation thrown at the Suleman family to be applied to their situations.
The only thing that seems to be the big problem with people in regards to this woman is the fact that she is unmarried. No one is asking where the Duggars are getting the money to take care of their kids--they are realtors and the market is horrible. Why is it an issue with this woman and not with them? And why is no one disgusted by the Duggars accepting donations on their website? Is it because their family is "natural" and therefore that double-digit population doesn't count since "natural" parents are less to blame for conceptions?
This woman did not seek out the media, the media sought her out so they could ask belittling rhetorical questions about how irresponsible she is on camera. People only want to see her so they can tell her how much she disgusts them for being a single mother with a large family. They only want to shake their finger at her, evaluate her finances and tell her how selfish and "crazy" she is because she couldn't find a guy like Bob Duggar. Michelle and Bob Duggar are cooed and given gifts but the single mom is a selfish psycho. It's OK because they are married.
Having two ringmasters doesn't make it less of a circus.
The basis of this hatred towards this woman is the fact that she is no longer married, she can't conceive children naturally--and please do not be silly enough to suggest adoption; married people have problems adopting children, do you really think the system would give her a break?--so she chose in-vitro fertilization. Everyone is so busy basking in the glow of their unearned sense of self-righteousness that they won't even acknowledge that the fact that these children survived is a miracle.
I'm not going to pass judgment on this woman for her decision (and I don't think that anyone else should, either), but there is a gross double standard that is being glossed over. The Duggar family is on its 18th or 19th kid and plans on having more and they get cooed on the Today Show with gifts and even get their own television show. They have a place on their site where people can donate money to them, and that is OK with everyone. The Duggar family gets nothing but praise. They keep having kids because it "makes [them] feel young" and soon as the child starts talking the kid is dumped on one of the older children to be raised in their "buddy system." Everyone is fine with the fact that Bob and Michelle Duggar have a permanent baby shower registry at Wal-Mart or wherever it is that they go. No one feels sorry for those kids or thinks the parents need to be locked up. But this woman "has issues" and everyone is pitying her kids for her "irresponsibility." This woman chooses to have a large family and she is branded as being mentally unstable because she chose not to get married? Her mother condemns her to anyone that will listen because she "wasn't raised to have kids without getting married?" If she were married would that make her more "stable" in their eyes?
She had 14 children. There is no evidence of abuse or neglect, but she is the mother that everyone loves to shake their fingers at. She is the most hated mother in America. She is getting death threats not for running a child prostitution ring, but for giving birth. There are children being neglected at this very moment. There are children being verbally abused and underfed at this very moment. There are mothers and fathers at this very moment in this country right now beating, sexually abusing or selling their children to be sexually abused by paying pedophiles...yet Nadya Suleman is the most vilified mother in America? Instead of spending all this rage on someone whose crime is wanting a large family, why not put that rage where it deserves to be: at the people that have children and are actually abusing them. I think some of those children would love to have some of the indignation thrown at the Suleman family to be applied to their situations.
The only thing that seems to be the big problem with people in regards to this woman is the fact that she is unmarried. No one is asking where the Duggars are getting the money to take care of their kids--they are realtors and the market is horrible. Why is it an issue with this woman and not with them? And why is no one disgusted by the Duggars accepting donations on their website? Is it because their family is "natural" and therefore that double-digit population doesn't count since "natural" parents are less to blame for conceptions?
This woman did not seek out the media, the media sought her out so they could ask belittling rhetorical questions about how irresponsible she is on camera. People only want to see her so they can tell her how much she disgusts them for being a single mother with a large family. They only want to shake their finger at her, evaluate her finances and tell her how selfish and "crazy" she is because she couldn't find a guy like Bob Duggar. Michelle and Bob Duggar are cooed and given gifts but the single mom is a selfish psycho. It's OK because they are married.
Having two ringmasters doesn't make it less of a circus.
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
A Casual Observation
Do you notice that when many Democratic-leaning voters do not get the outcome they want in elections, they pout for a while. The most extreme action is that they move to another area. They may even grumble every few months, but bottom line is that most of the responses are low-grade verbal ones. That tends to be the average reaction from the base.
But when many Republican-leaning voters do not get the outcome they want in elections, they buy guns, make death threats, go on every pro-whomever site and make vicious commentary, try to block the Democrats in their churches from getting Communion or kicking them out of church completely. That tends to be the average reaction from the base.
Disturbing, isn't it?
But when many Republican-leaning voters do not get the outcome they want in elections, they buy guns, make death threats, go on every pro-whomever site and make vicious commentary, try to block the Democrats in their churches from getting Communion or kicking them out of church completely. That tends to be the average reaction from the base.
Disturbing, isn't it?
Friday, January 30, 2009
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Blagojevich Kicked to the Curb
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Where Were You When Barack Obama Became President?
I was sitting on the loveseat in my living room. I had a late breakfast and was eating it in front of the television. I was holding the rosary that my friend gave me as a graduation gift and a small American flag. When he was sworn in, I stood up. Everything seemed so surreal. I was so excited when I saw President Obama and Mr. Bush walking out together; I kept thinking Mr. Bush is now the former president of the United States. I laughed as people that were there sang "Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey GOODBYE" as Mr. Bush did his final flyover Washington. I ran to my computer so I could see the White House webpage updated with our new president's image and agenda. Where were you?
Friday, January 16, 2009
Being Pro-Life v. Pro-Fetus
I am pro-life, however, I don’t associate with the mainstream pro-life movement. The reason being that a startling percentage of the people I encounter are not really pro-life, they are pro-fetus. Yes, Virginia, there is a difference. Someone that is pro-fetus angrily protests against abortion, yet with that same voice they condemn the same woman postpartum for being a single mother. A pro-fetus person is against government-sponsored programs that help said mother take care of that child because the mother "shouldn't have kids she can't afford." They preach about adoption, yet take no interest in petitioning for more oversight for foster homes so that these children aren't abused. And whenever some of these children have the chance to be adopted, a pro-fetus person is more concerned with whether or not the couple can buy a wedding cake topper at Wal-Mart than whether or not the couple can give that child a safe, happy home. A pro-fetus person will get on a jury and let a rapist go back out into the world to forcibly impregnate other women because “boys will be boys” and the woman “should have known better” or should “get over it,” with the caveat that if she was really raped, then she wouldn't have kept the child so she must have tried to trap him and it backfired. And if that isn't bad enough, they also support the idea that the rapist should have visitation rights. I have even encountered pro-fetus people that believe that if the father didn't want the child, then he shouldn't have to pay child support.
My faith teaches that life begins at the moment of conception, but I also subscribe to this crazy idea that the life doesn't end after the umbilical cord is cut. I now realize that there are pro-life people and pro-fetus people. A pro-fetus person's concern ends after the child is born.
A pro-life person doesn't mind tax dollars being used for programs that provide prenatal care. They support programs that help train these mothers for jobs. They completely support any programs that provide counseling for pregnancy-via-rape (and hopefully they are vehemently against cities where victims are charged for their rape kits). A pro-life person doesn’t feel like he/she is being robbed when one of these parents gets assistance to feed this child. They don't complain about tax dollars going to public schools or daycare—yes, I have actually heard people complain about tax dollars going to public schools. They also don't mind government grants and loans being available to that child once they grow up so that he/she can go to college. A pro-life person opposes legislation such as the Texas law (signed by so-called pro-life Gov. George W. Bush) that allows hospitals to take people off life support after 30 days without the consent of family, such was the case of 4-month-old Sun Hudson, whose mother lost the court battle to save her infant son's life while everyone else was paying attention to Terry Shiavo. A pro-life person doesn't demand that people stop taking communion because that person believes that reason trumps rage.
So that is what separates pro-life from pro-fetus: the idea that the concern doesn’t end after the mother has walked away from a clinic. That love and charity are more effective than anger and shock tactics. A pro-life person cares about that life (both of them) from the very beginning to the very end.
Thankfully, I now belong to an organization that shares those same beliefs.
My faith teaches that life begins at the moment of conception, but I also subscribe to this crazy idea that the life doesn't end after the umbilical cord is cut. I now realize that there are pro-life people and pro-fetus people. A pro-fetus person's concern ends after the child is born.
A pro-life person doesn't mind tax dollars being used for programs that provide prenatal care. They support programs that help train these mothers for jobs. They completely support any programs that provide counseling for pregnancy-via-rape (and hopefully they are vehemently against cities where victims are charged for their rape kits). A pro-life person doesn’t feel like he/she is being robbed when one of these parents gets assistance to feed this child. They don't complain about tax dollars going to public schools or daycare—yes, I have actually heard people complain about tax dollars going to public schools. They also don't mind government grants and loans being available to that child once they grow up so that he/she can go to college. A pro-life person opposes legislation such as the Texas law (signed by so-called pro-life Gov. George W. Bush) that allows hospitals to take people off life support after 30 days without the consent of family, such was the case of 4-month-old Sun Hudson, whose mother lost the court battle to save her infant son's life while everyone else was paying attention to Terry Shiavo. A pro-life person doesn't demand that people stop taking communion because that person believes that reason trumps rage.
So that is what separates pro-life from pro-fetus: the idea that the concern doesn’t end after the mother has walked away from a clinic. That love and charity are more effective than anger and shock tactics. A pro-life person cares about that life (both of them) from the very beginning to the very end.
Thankfully, I now belong to an organization that shares those same beliefs.
Friday, January 02, 2009
Yes, I'm THAT bored
You Are Upper Class |
 Class isn't always about money, and you've at least got the brains, manners, and interests of an upper class person. You don't have a trashy bone in your body, and you don't pretend to be someone you're not. You're comfortable with your station in life, and class issues don't really bother you. The finest things in life are within your reach, and you're comfortable enjoying them. You may end up: A business leader, corporate lawyer, or philanthropist Other people who share your class: Bill Gates, Oprah, former world leaders like Bill Clinton, and those reclusive billionaires no one ever talks about. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)